Abstract

Analogies have been shown to improve motor learning in various tasks and settings. In this study we tested whether applying analogies can shorten the motor learning process and induce insight and skill improvement in tasks that usually demand many hours of practice. Kinematic measures were used to quantify participant’s skill and learning dynamics. For this purpose, we used a drawing task, in which subjects drew lines to connect dots, and a mirror game, in which subjects tracked a moving stimulus. After establishing a baseline, subjects were given an analogy, explicit instructions or no further instruction. We compared their improvement in skill (quantified by coarticulation or smoothness), accuracy and movement duration. Subjects in the analogy and explicit groups improved their coarticulation in the target task, while significant differences were found in the mirror game only at a slow movement frequency between analogy and controls.We conclude that a verbal analogy can be a useful tool for rapidly changing motor kinematics and movement strategy in some circumstances, although in the tasks selected it did not produce better performance in most measurements than explicit guidance. Furthermore, we observed that different movement facets may improve independently from others, and may be selectively affected by verbal instructions. These results suggest an important role for the type of instruction in motor learning.

Highlights

  • Analogies have been shown to improve motor learning in various tasks and settings

  • We set out to test if analogies can shorten the motor learning process and if their effects can be seen on a kinematic level

  • Our results were less uniform than expected, with the explicit group outperforming the significant gains in coarticulation of the analogy group in the target task

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Analogies have been shown to improve motor learning in various tasks and settings. In this study we tested whether applying analogies can shorten the motor learning process and induce insight and skill improvement in tasks that usually demand many hours of practice. Researchers have defined explicit motor learning as conscious control of a motor task This type of knowledge structure relies on working memory and is characterized by learning rules that govern the movement and being able to explicitly state such rules. Implicit learning techniques can involve the use of a secondary cognitive task designed to occupy working memory and may reduce the chance that learners consciously form explicit rules or test hypotheses about their performance of the task[10]. While such studies have demonstrated the advantages of implicit learning, the methods used in these studies aren’t necessarily easy to apply in the real world

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call