Abstract
This research aims to analyze Tax Court Decision is not in accordance with evidences and provisions of tax law and regulation. This research aims also explains standing of Branch Offices and Head Office. In legal provisions, Branch Office is part of Head Office. For simplicity of administration, Head Office and Branch Office are separate entities in fulfilling Tax Obligations referred to Article 12 paragraph (1) of VAT Law, including for purposes of tax invoices. Conclusion from this research is Agreement signed by Head Office with PT Pertamina EP in Jakarta, and also Invoice issued from Head Office to PT Pertamina EP could not be assessed that the person who make submission was Head Office. We need see substance of goods carried out from Batam, Evidence of news event handover of goods show that transfer of rights of taxable goods by Branch Office to PT Pertamina in Batam, and customs documents indicating that PT Pertamina as the owner of goods from since Batam.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.