ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK MENGGUNAKAN RASIO YANG TERDAPAT PADA RGEC (BANK DEVISA KONVENSIONAL DAN BANK DEVISA SYARIAH PERIODE 2014-2018)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze and test the differences of soundness level between conventional foreign exchange banks and sharia foreign exchange banks in Indonesia. The application of the assessment used RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital) method which was explained by NPF, FDR GCG, ROA, ROE, BOPO, and CAR ratios. The data analysis methods used in this study were descriptive statistics and the Mann–Whitney U test. The total sample in this study was 22 banks (17 conventional foreign exchange banks and 5 sharia foreign exchange banks) which were selected by using a purposive sampling technique. The results of the study proved that there were significant differences NPF, ROA, BOPO, and CAR variables between conventional foreign exchange banks and sharia foreign exchange banks and there were no significant differences in the FDR, GCG, and ROE variables. Sharia foreign exchange banks had FDR and GCG variables that were superior to conventional foreign exchange banks, while the NPL, ROA, ROE, BOPO, and CAR variables of conventional foreign exchange banks were superior when compared to sharia foreign exchange banks. Sharia foreign exchange banks need to improve the quality of banks such as increasing credit for DPK, better in providing the rate of return, further increasing the results of earnings and equity. Whereas the other variables need to be monitored to remain stable and in accordance with predetermined criteria. Keywords: RGEC, bank soundness, NPF, FDR, GCG, ROA, ROE, BOPO, CAR