Abstract

Accounting standards is fundamental in the preparation of financial statements that must be referred to each company. Accounting standards that form these statement codified in a book called financial accounting standards (GAAP). The book contains a collection of statement of financial accounting standards (SFAS). This study aims to determine the extent of the financial statement presetations of BMT Al-Ittihad in applying generally accepted accounting principles in particular SFAS No.101. This research is a comparative descriptive research that describes, explains and compares the financial statements of BMT with SFAS 101. The research subject is a sharia cooperative BMT Al-Ittihad Pekanbaru while the object is to report RAT BMT Al-Ittihad Pekanbaru. Data were collected by interview and documentations. The analisis is comparative descriptive analysis, which compares the data that has been collected by the relevant theories to draw a conclusion. Based on the results, itshow that the financial statements of BMT Al-Ittihad has not fully adopted SFAS No.101, because: 1) it does not present a statement of sources and uses of zakah, 2) it does not present a statement of sources and uses of charity fund, 3) it does not present a note to the financial statements, 4) it does not present informations of preparations of financial statements and the accounting polices used, and it does not to disclose information required under SFAS No.101.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.