Abstract

The use of high-intensity non-automatic weighing instruments can cause users to overlook the load's location during weighing. However, electronic non-automatic weighing instruments maintain measurement accuracy regardless of the load's position. This study aims to analyze the effect of load receptor size on error values when testing non-automatic weighing instruments eccentricity using the OIML R-76 recommended method. Testing the eccentricity of electronic non-automatic weighing instruments with the same construction model, load cell, and indicator but different load receptor sizes can affect the non-automatic weighing instruments' error values. The largest error value on Instrument A, with a load floor size of 40x30cm, is -0.025kg at test point 4. On Instrument A, the smallest error value at test points 1, 2, and 5 is -0.005kg. On Instrument B, with a load floor size of 60x50cm, the largest error value at test points 1 and 4 is -0.005kg, respectively. At test points 2-3-5, the smallest error value on Instrument B is 0kg. The average error on Instrument A is -0.01kg, while on Instrument B it is 0kg. The size of the load receptor affects the increase in the error value of a non-automatic weighing instrument, with larger load receptor resulting in greater error values, even if the construction design of the load receptor support is the same.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.