Abstract
Companies need to evaluate supplier performance to get those that match the company's criteria. The problem with UD. Morodadi Jaya is that there are no appropriate criteria and standards to be set in the selection of suppliers so that the company does not have supplier performance evaluations. The purpose of this study was to determine the weight of the value of each criterion used in making the decision to choose the best alternative supplier at UD. Morodadi Jaya. There are five criteria used, including: availability of goods, price, quality of goods, delivery, service. To obtain complete data, the researchers used methods in the form of interviews and filling out questionnaires. The method used in processing the data in this study is the AHP and TOPSIS methods. Based on data processing using the AHP method, the weights with the highest criteria are on the availability of goods, followed by the next rank, namely delivery, price, quality, service. Then for data processing using TOPSIS can be seen that the supplier PT. Prima Aluminum is the most potential supplier. The next alternative priority is based on the ranking in a row.
 Keywords: Analytical Hierarchy Process; Supplier Selection; TOPSIS
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Al-Kharaj : Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
