Abstract
Interpretation is one of the legal discovery methods that can provide a clearer explanation of the text of the law. The method of interpretation is a means or tool for understanding the meaning of the law, so that its justification lies in its usefulness for carrying out concrete provisions and not for the sake of the method itself. This paper aims to identify the method of interpretation used by judges in court and find out the method used by judges in interpreting the decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 on the formal review of Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation. The method used is a normative method which positions law as a system of norms for analyzing laws that have been decided by judges through court proceedings. The approach used is the law approach. Data sources come from secondary data sources with primary legal materials, namely Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation and Consitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 and secondary law, which are law books and journal articles. Technical data analysis is content analysis which is presented with analytical descriptive. The results of this study indicate that the method of interpretation used by Constitutional Court Judges in interpreting Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 regarding the formal review of Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation is a method of systematic interpretation, doctrinal interpretation, and sociological interpretation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
