Abstract
Unconventional columns are very familiar in modern building construction because they impact the room's efficiency. Meanwhile, conventional columns affect the lack of efficiency in the room's functions. The performance analysis of the two types of columns used pushover analysis of the capacity spectrum method using ETABS v 16.1.0 software. The performance level results of the two types of columns in low-rise buildings are the same, which is Immediate Occupancy. The most significant maximum shearing force is at a low-rise building with an unconventional column with a maximum displacement on the east side of 160,00 mm. The smallest is a low-rise building with a conventional column in the east direction with maximum displacement on the Nort side of 90,11 mm. Thus, comparing the performance of the two types of columns can be concluded that conventional columns are stronger than unconventional columns.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
