Abstract

The research aims to determine the ability of students to answer of National Exam question’s and Odd Semester Exams questions as well as to know the quality of National Exams Class XI Odd Semester Year 2012- 2016 and Odd Semester Exams academic year 2016/2017 based on experiments viewed from the cognitive aspects based on bloom's taxonomy, level of difficultness, distinguishing power, and reliability. The method in this research using quantitative descriptive method. Sample test question is 6 class XI MIA amounted to 238 students with cluster sample technique .. The object of research is a matter of National Exams Class XI Odd Semester Year 2012- 2016 and about UAS coming from 6 schools. The results showed that students are better able to answer the National Exams question’s compared with Odd Semester Exams based on the average score of students in answering Odd Semester Exams question’s is higher than the National Exams question. Based on the cognitive aspects of Bloom's taxonomy the distribution of Odd Semester Exams academic year 2016/2017 does not meet the proportion of balanced questions based on formulation C1 40% C2 20% C3 20% C4 10% C5 5% C6 5%. Based on the difficulties of the distribution of UN and UAS Problems Ganjil T.P 2016/2017 does not meet the criteria of a balanced question based on a difficult formulation 25% medium 50% and easy 25%. Based on the distinguishing power of the distribution of the question of National Exam and Odd Semester Exams academic year 2016/2017 not meet the criteria of a good question with the criterion of differentiating power 0,30 - 1,00 ≥ 85%. Criteria of differentiating power 0,30 - 1,00 on question’s of National Exams 32%, Odd Semester Exams of MAN 1 Medan 36%, MAN 2 Medan Model 53%, SMAN 4 Medan 52%, SMAN 9 Medan 35%, SMAN 11 Medan 49 %, SMAN 18 Medan 23%. Based on the reliability, the problem of National Exams has low reliability (0.3) while the average Odd Semester Exams has high reliability (0.60-0.79).Keywords : Analysis, item test, National Exam, Odd Semester Exam

Highlights

  • Evaluasi adalah kegiatan yang terencana untuk mengetahui keadaan suatu objek dengan menggunakan instrument dan membandingkan hasilnya dengan tolak ukur untuk memperoleh kesimpulan

  • Menurut observasi pada bimbingan belajar Adzkia didapatkan hasil Try Out Ujian Nasional T.P 2016/2017 di beberapa sekolah, ternyata nilai rata-rata untuk bidang studi Biologi adalah 3,44 3,96 4,82 dan 6,25 dari empat sekolah yang berbeda

  • Berdasarkan nilai rata-rata Try Out Ujian Nasional untuk bidang studi Biologi dari empat sekolah tersebut, maka kemampuan siswa dalam menjawab soal Ujian Nasional masih dikategorikan kurang dan cukup

Read more

Summary

METODE PENELITIAN

Penelitian uji coba soal dilakukan di Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 1 Medan (MAN 1 Medan). Waktu penelitian dilakukan dari bulan Maret sampai dengan Mei 2017. Populasi sumber soal Ujian Akhir Semester Ganjil T.P 2016/2017 dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh pISSN : 2338 - 3003 eISSN : 2502 - 3217 sekolah SMAN dan MAN yang sudah memiliki Akreditasi A di kota Medan. Jadi sampel sumber soal Ujian Akhir Semester Ganjil adalah soal pilihan berganda diambil dari enam sekolah yaitu MAN 1 Medan, MAN 2 Model Medan, SMAN 4 Medan, SMAN 9 Medan, SMAN 11 Medan, dan SMAN 18 Medan. Sampel kelas untuk uji coba Soal Ujian Nasional dan Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Ganjil dalam penelitian ini adalah enam kelas dari delapan kelas MIA (Matematika Ilmu Alam) yang sama yaitu XI MIA-1, XI MIA-2, XI MIA-3 dan XI MIA-4, XI-MIA-5 dan XI-MIA-6 dengan mengunakan Sampel Kelompok atau Cluster Sample.

Kemampuan siswa menjawab Soal UN dan UAS
Analisis Pengelompokan Soal Berdasarkan Aspek Kognitif Taksonomi Bloom
Analisis Tingkat Kesukaran Soal UN dan UAS Ganjil
Analisis Daya Pembeda Soal UN dan UAS Ganjil
Kemampuan Siswa Menjawab Soal UN dan UAS
Aspek Kognitif Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom
UCAPAN TERIMAKASIH
Findings
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.