Abstract

Anaerobic digestion for the production of methane containing biogas is the classic example of a resource recovery process that combines stabilization of particulate organic matter or wastewater treatment with the production of a valuable end-product. Attractive features of the process include the production of a single end-product from a heterogeneous feedstock, and in-situ product separation of the gaseous end-product. Despite these intrinsic attractive properties of the process, the economic added value of the biogas produced is limited, enabling the development of alternative processes that yield higher-value end-products. Typically the production of higher value end-products from low value feedstock and industrial wastewater proceeds via intermediate production of organic acids (and carbon dioxide and molecular hydrogen). Optimization of organic acid production from particulate feedstocks and wastewater for development of the organic acid based resource recovery route receives significant research attention. The organic acid stream generated as such, has no economic value, but if organic acids can either be concentrated via membrane separation or (bio)converted to an end-product that can easily be separated from the liquid, an attractive biomass processing scheme can be developed. Attractive end-products of organic acid processing include polyhydroxyalkanoates, medium chain length fatty acids, or other organic molecules using bio-electrochemical systems. Overall we suggest that these novel bioprocessing routes for conversion of low value feedstock to higher added value products will contribute to a sustainable future and will change the economic status of organic waste.

Highlights

  • Environmental engineering processes traditionally aim for removal of polluting compounds from water, soil, or gas

  • In summary we suggest that anaerobic digestion as bioenergy process can only be implemented in economically viable way when adequate subsidies are supplied to overcome the competition with natural gas

  • It should be noted that because the maximum specific growth rate of crucial steps in the anaerobic digestion process like aceticlastic methanogenesis are much lower than aerobic growth rates, suggesting that the time needed for start-up of the process or for recovery after a process failure in anaerobic wastewater treatment plants, is much longer compared to aerobic processes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Environmental engineering processes traditionally aim for removal of polluting compounds from water, soil, or gas. It has been recognized that an alternative approach to anaerobic processing of biomass is to aim for production of organic acids and/or alcohols instead of methane containing biogas Direct recovery of these water soluble products of biomass fermentation or post-processing to obtain other molecules (e.g. polyhydroxyalkanoates, or medium chain length fatty acids) may result in the production of more valuable end-products of the resource recovery process. In this paper we will discuss first to which extent methane containing biogas production is an important driver for application of the anaerobic digestion process in relation to other arguments for application of anaerobic digestion instead of alternative technologies Based on these considerations we will elaborate where the most prosperous niche remains for production of other compounds from waste

Methane containing biogas as process driver
In situ production separation
Thermodynamic driver of the process
C CH4 CH4 CH2 H2 C6H12O6 C2H6O C6H12O2 CH3O
Anaerobic treatment of slurries with a high solid content
VFA as central intermediate
Bioreactor development for high-rate organic acid production from wastewater
Valorisation of VFA
Membranes
Anion exchange and direct recovery
PHA production
MCFA production
Findings
Summary and outlook
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call