Abstract

What is the higher-dimensional analog of a permutation? If we think of a permutation as given by a permutation matrix, then the following definition suggests itself: A d-dimensional permutation of order n is an n×n×...×n=[n]d+1 array of zeros and ones in which every line contains a unique 1 entry. A line here is a set of entries of the form {(x 1,...,x i−1,y,x i+1,...,x d+1)|n≥y≥1} for some index d+1≥i≥1 and some choice of x j ∈ [n] for all j ≠ i. It is easy to observe that a one-dimensional permutation is simply a permutation matrix and that a two-dimensional permutation is synonymous with an order-n Latin square. We seek an estimate for the number of d-dimensional permutations. Our main result is the following upper bound on their number $$\left( {(1 + o(1))\frac{n} {{e^d }}} \right)^{n^d } .$$ We tend to believe that this is actually the correct number, but the problem of proving the complementary lower bound remains open. Our main tool is an adaptation of Brégman’s [1] proof of the Minc conjecture on permanents. More concretely, our approach is very close in spirit to Schrijver’s [11] and Radhakrishnan’s [10] proofs of Brégman’s theorem.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.