Abstract

BackgroundThe transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase HER2 is overexpressed in approximately 15% of breast tumors and correlates with poor clinical prognosis. Several treatments that target HER2 are approved for treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. The serum biomarkers most widely used to monitor anti-HER2 therapies in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer currently are CA15.3 and CEA. Nevertheless, their clinical utility in patients with breast cancer remains a subject of discussion and controversy; thus, additional markers may prove useful in monitoring the therapeutic responses of these patients. The extracellular domain of HER2 can be shed by proteolytic cleavage into the circulation and this shed form, sHER2, is reported to be augmented during metastasis of HER2-positive breast tumors. Here, we studied the clinical usefulness of sHER2, CA15.3, and CEA for monitoring treatment for breast cancer.MethodsWe measured prospectively pretreatment and post-treatment serum levels (day 1, 30, 60 and 90) of these three biomarkers in 47 HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab in combination with paclitaxel. Evaluation of the disease was performed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) at day 90.ResultsPatients with progressive disease at day 90 had smaller relative changes between day 1 and day 30 than those with complete, partial or stable responses at day 90: -9% versus -38% for sHER2 (P = 0.02), +23% versus -17% for CA15.3 (P = 0.005) and +29% versus -26% for CEA (P = 0.02). Patients with progressive disease at day 90 were less likely than the other patients to have a relative decrease of > 20% in their biomarker levels at day 30: 6% vs 33% for sHER2 (P = 0.03), 0% vs 27% for CA15.3 (P = 0.03), 4% vs 29% for CEA (P = 0.04). No patient with progressive disease at day 90 had > 20% reduction of the average combined biomarker levels at day 30 whereas 63% of the other patients had (P = 0.003). Moreover, when we analyzed a > 10% reduction of the average biomarker levels no patient with progressive disease at day 90 had a decrease > 10% at day 30 whereas 78% of other patients had (P<0.001, Se = 100%, Sp = 78%).ConclusionWe show that regular measurement of sHER2, CA15.3, and CEA levels is useful for predicting the therapeutic response and for monitoring HER2-targeted therapy in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. The average decrease of the three biomarkers with a threshold of > 10% appears to be the best parameter to distinguish patients who go on to have progressive disease from those who will have a complete, partial or stable response.

Highlights

  • Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer in women; over a million new cases are diagnosed per year worldwide and this is an important health issue [1]

  • We show that regular measurement of soluble HER2 (sHER2), CA15.3, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels is useful for predicting the therapeutic response and for monitoring HER2-targeted therapy in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer

  • We evaluated the kinetics of change in the three biomarker levels at day 1, 30, 60 and 90 in the different therapeutic response groups (Fig 2) Between day 1 and day 30 of treatment, we observed an average decrease of 34% in serum levels of sHER2 (P

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer in women; over a million new cases are diagnosed per year worldwide and this is an important health issue [1]. ASCO notes that CEA and CA15.3 levels should be interpreted with caution during the first 4–6 weeks of administration of a new therapy because spurious increases may occur [16] This may be due, in part, to conflicting conclusions reached by different researchers, and to the fact that the serum of breast cancer patients is often not positive for these biomarkers or that they are not sensitive enough to detect the disease [7, 17]. The serum biomarkers most widely used to monitor anti-HER2 therapies in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer currently are CA15.3 and CEA Their clinical utility in patients with breast cancer remains a subject of discussion and controversy; additional markers may prove useful in monitoring the therapeutic responses of these patients. We studied the clinical usefulness of sHER2, CA15.3, and CEA for monitoring treatment for breast cancer

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call