Abstract
Actively managed ETFs are a relatively recent introduction to the investing landscape, and understanding their performance against passive funds is becoming increasingly important. Consistent with preliminary studies, I find that active funds are more volatile than their passive counterparts and do not provide an absolute return advantage. Thus, active ETFs are generally not good substitutes for existing passively managed funds. However, in contrast to prior studies, I find that performance metrics based on relative risk (e.g., Information and Treynor ratios) suggest that active funds may be good additions to existing portfolios for their diversification benefits. I also find that these relative benefits are primarily concentrated in the funds with the highest average daily trading volume. <b>TOPICS:</b>Exchange-traded funds and applications, portfolio construction, volatility measures
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.