Abstract

Understanding how biological systems convert and store energy is a primary purpose of basic research. However, despite Mitchell's chemiosmotic theory, we are far from the complete description of basic processes such as oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and photosynthesis. After more than half a century, the chemiosmotic theory may need updating, thanks to the latest structural data on respiratory chain complexes. In particular, up-to date technologies, such as those using fluorescence indicators following proton displacements, have shown that proton translocation is lateral rather than transversal with respect to the coupling membrane. Furthermore, the definition of the physical species involved in the transfer (proton, hydroxonium ion or proton currents) is still an unresolved issue, even though the latest acquisitions support the idea that protonic currents, difficult to measure, are involved. Moreover, FoF1-ATP synthase ubiquitous motor enzyme has the peculiarity (unlike most enzymes) of affecting the thermodynamic equilibrium of ATP synthesis. It seems that the concept of diffusion of the proton charge expressed more than two centuries ago by Theodor von Grotthuss is to be taken into consideration to resolve these issues. All these uncertainties remind us that also in biology it is necessary to consider the Heisenberg indeterminacy principle, which sets limits to analytical questions.

Highlights

  • The ‘chemiosmotic theory’ formulated by Mitchell [1], a researcher with an Anglo-Saxon training in chemistry, dates back more than 50 years

  • An upgrading of the chemiosmotic theory appears necessary in light of the enormous progress of bioanalytic techniques defining the fine structure of the macromolecular complexes involved in oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) [2 –7], notably studies on complex I (NADH: ubiquinone oxidoreductase) and complex IV [2,3,8]

  • Starting from basic physical chemical data (Avogadro number, ionic water product, mathematical pH expression and mitochondrial volume), this study demonstrated that free protons in a mitochondrial periplasmic space are too few to support any process dependent on proton translocation in the aqueous bulk across the membrane and absolutely inadequate to support the thousands of ATP synthase molecules present in a mitochondrion

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ‘chemiosmotic theory’ formulated by Mitchell [1], a researcher with an Anglo-Saxon training in chemistry, dates back more than 50 years. An upgrading of the chemiosmotic theory appears necessary in light of the enormous progress of bioanalytic techniques defining the fine structure of the macromolecular complexes involved in oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) [2 –7], notably studies on complex I (NADH: ubiquinone oxidoreductase) and complex IV (cytochrome c oxidase) [2,3,8]. In this review, we debate the possibility to update the chemiosmotic theory and unravel the role of local processes in the coupling. This may help in developing new strategies for innovative research centred on cellular bioenergetics. (2) ATP synthase, synthesizing/hydrolysing ATP through Hþ translocation; and (3) impermeability of the inner mitochondrial membrane to ionic species thereby including protons

The chemiosmotic theory and FoF1-ATP synthase
Controversies about the chemiosmotic theory
A crucial issue: the membrane permeability to protons
Proton solvation
Grotthuss mechanism and proton translocation through the membranes
Inhibition of ATP hydrolysis: an open topic
Local processes for the coupling inside the respiring membranes
Proposal for a localized complex I-ATP synthase coupling
10. Extramitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation
11. Conclusion
76. Riccardi D et al 2006 Development of effective

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.