Abstract

Isotope-dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) is considered to be a method without significant correction factors. It is also believed that this method is well understood. But unfortunately a large number of different uncertainty budgets have been published that consider different correction factors. These differences lead to conflicting combined uncertainties especially in trace analysis. It is described how the known correction factors must be considered in the uncertainty budget of values determined by IDMS combined with ICP-MS (ICP-IDMS). The corrections applied are dead time, background, interference, mass discrimination, blank correction and air buoyancy.IDMS measurements consist always of a series of isotope abundance ratio measurements and can be done according to different measurement protocols. Because the measurement protocols of IDMS are often rather sophisticated, correlations of influence quantities are difficult to identify. Therefore the measurement protocol has to be carefully considered in the specification of the measurand and a strategy is presented to properly account for these correlations. This will be exemplified for the estimation of mass fractions of platinum group elements (PGEs) and Re in the geological reference material UB-N (from CRPG-CNRS, Nancy in France) with ICP-IDMS. The PGEs with more than one isotope and the element Re are measured with on-line cation-exchange chromatography coupled to a quadrupole ICP-MS. All contents are below 10 microg kg(-1). Only osmium is separated from the matrix by direct sparging of OsO(4) into the plasma. This leads to transient signals for all PGEs and Re. It is possible to estimate the combined uncertainties and keep them favourably small despite the low contents, the transient signals and the sophisticated correction model.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call