Abstract

ObjectivesThis study was conducted in order to develop and validate an ultrasonic-based radiomics nomogram for diagnosing solid renal masses.MethodsSix hundred renal solid masses with benign renal lesions (n = 204) and malignant renal tumors (n = 396) were divided into a training set (n = 480) and a validation set (n = 120). Radiomics features were extracted from ultrasound (US) images preoperatively and then a radiomics score (RadScore) was calculated. By integrating the RadScore and independent clinical factors, a radiomics nomogram was constructed. The diagnostic performance of junior physician, senior physician, RadScore, and radiomics nomogram in identifying benign from malignant solid renal masses was evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) in both the training and validation sets. The clinical usefulness of the nomogram was assessed using decision curve analysis (DCA).ResultsThe radiomics signature model showed satisfactory discrimination in the training set [area under the ROC (AUC), 0.887; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.860–0.915] and the validation set (AUC, 0.874; 95% CI, 0.816–0.932). The radiomics nomogram also demonstrated good calibration and discrimination in the training set (AUC, 0.911; 95% CI, 0.886–0.936) and the validation set (AUC, 0.861; 95% CI, 0.802–0.921). In addition, the radiomics nomogram model showed higher accuracy in discriminating benign and malignant renal masses compared with the evaluations by junior physician (DeLong p = 0.004), and the model also showed significantly higher specificity than the senior and junior physicians (0.93 vs. 0.57 vs. 0.46).ConclusionsThe ultrasonic-based radiomics nomogram shows favorable predictive efficacy in differentiating solid renal masses.

Highlights

  • The majority of renal masses are malignant, about 16% to 19% of renal tumors are reported to be benign [1–3]

  • The diagnostic performance of junior physician, senior physician, RadScore, and radiomics nomogram in identifying benign from malignant solid renal masses was evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) in both the training and validation sets

  • The radiomics nomogram model showed higher accuracy in discriminating benign and malignant renal masses compared with the evaluations by junior physician (DeLong p = 0.004), and the model showed significantly higher specificity than the senior and junior physicians (0.93 vs. 0.57 vs. 0.46)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The majority of renal masses are malignant, about 16% to 19% of renal tumors are reported to be benign [1–3]. Renal cancers need to be surgically resected, whereas for benign renal neoplasms, especially for small renal masses, conservative management is performed. Accurate preoperative identification of benign from malignant solid renal masses is challenging for a radiologist [4]. Percutaneous renal biopsy is an important pretreatment diagnostic procedure in the evaluation of indeterminate renal masses. The diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous biopsy ranges from 70% to 90%, and its role in clinical management remains unclear because of the negative predictive value and the possible complications, including bleeding, perirenal hematoma, hematuria, arteriovenous fistula formation, and pneumothorax [5–7]. It is of vital importance to search for an accurate as well as safe and noninvasive diagnostic tool to distinguish benign from malignant solid renal masses in the preoperative clinical decisionmaking process

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call