Abstract

The pampe package for R implements the panel data approach method for program evalua- tion designed to estimate the causal effects of political interventions or treatments. This procedure exploits the dependence among cross-sectional units to construct a counterfactual of the treated unit(s), and it is an appropriate method for research events that occur at an aggregate level like countries or regions and that affect only one or a small number of units. The implementation of the pampe package is illustrated using data from Hong Kong and 24 other units, by examining the economic impact of the political and economic integration of Hong Kong with mainland China in 1997 and 2004 respectively. An introduction to the panel data approach and program evaluation methods Program evaluation methodologies have long been used by social scientists to measure the effect of different economic or political interventions (treatments). The problem is, of course, that you cannot observe the outcome both under the intervention and in the absence of the intervention simultaneously, hence the need for program evaluation methods. Traditionally, comparative case studies have been the preferred method by researchers in order to compare units affected by a treatment or event (dubbed the treatment group) to one or more units not affected by this intervention (the control group). The idea is to use the outcome of the control group to obtain an approximation of what would have been the outcome of the treated group had it not been treated. In more recent years, synthetic control methods (Abadie and Gardeazabal, 2003; Abadie et al., 2010) have addressed these issues by introducing a data-driven procedure for selecting the control group. However, the synthetic control methods are not without shortcomings: since the synthetic control is calculated as a convex combination of the units in the donor pool, and thus it does not allow for extrapolation, it might be that a suitable synthetic control for our treated unit does not exist. Furthermore, the synthetic control is designed to be used with explanatory variables or covariates that help explain the variance in the outcome variable. For the cases when the researcher finds that extrapolation is needed to obtain a suitable comparison for the treated unit, or when the covariates available do not properly explain the outcome on which the effect of the treatment is intended to be measured, he or she might prefer to use the panel data approach for program evaluation by Hsiao et al. (2012). The panel data approach for constructing the counterfactual of the unit subjected to the intervention is to use other units that are not subject to the treatment to predict what would have happened to the treated unit had it not been subject to the policy intervention. The basic idea behind this approach is to rely on the correlations among cross-sectional units. They attribute the cross-sectional dependence to the presence of common factors that drive all the relevant cross-sectional units. As such, the aim of this article is to present the package pampe that implements the panel data approach for program evaluation procedures in R, which is available from the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pampe. The main function in the package is pampe(), which computes the counterfactual for the treated unit using the modeling strategy outlined by Hsiao et al. (2012). The function includes an option to obtain placebo tests. There is an additional function robustness(), which conducts a leave-one-out robustness on the results. The data example is also from Hsiao et al. (2012), which introduced the panel data approach methodology to study the effect of the political and economic integration of Hong Kong with mainland China using other countries geographically and economically close to Hong Kong as possible controls. The article is organized as follows. The following section is a brief overview of the panel data approach as defined by Hsiao et al. (2012). The main section of the paper, titled Implementing pampe in R, demonstrates the implementation of this method and the use of the pampe package with an example, including how to perform inference and robustness checks.

Highlights

  • An introduction to the panel data approach and program evaluation methods Program evaluation methodologies have long been used by social scientists to measure the effect of different economic or political interventions

  • This section expands on the implementation of the method itself as well as the placebo studies and how they can be interpreted by the user by means of two examples: the political and economic integration of Hong Kong with mainland China in 1997 and 2004, plus the reassignation of the treatment to other units in the control group and different pre-treatment dates

  • Hsiao et al (2012) use a combination of other countries to construct a counterfactual for Hong Kong that resembled the economy prior to the political and economic integration

Read more

Summary

The panel data approach method for program evaluation

The panel data approach for program evaluation exploits the dependence among cross-sectional units to construct a counterfactual of the treated unit(s), to estimate how the affected unit would have developed in the absence of an intervention. The panel data approach developed by Hsiao et al (2012) attempts to predict Y10t for t ≥ T and to estimate the treatment effect α1t by exploiting the dependency among cross-sectional units in the donor pool and the treated unit, using the following modeling strategy: use R2 (or likelihood values) in order to denoted by M(j)∗. Y10t could be predicted using the underlying model Hsiao et al (2012) specify and the assumptions they delineate Instead, they suggest a more practical approach, i.e., using the remaining non-intervened units in the donor pool Y−1t = The basic idea behind the placebo studies is to iterate the application of the panel data approach by reassigning the treatment to other non-treated units, i.e., to the controls in the donor pool; or by reassigning the treatment to other pre-intervention periods, when the treatment had yet to occur. The set of placebo effects can be compared to the effect that was estimated for the “real” time and unit, in order to evaluate whether the effect estimated by the panel data approach when and where the treatment occurred is large relative to the placebo effects

Implementing pampe in R
Austria Canada
Obtaining and transmitting results
Korea UnitedStates
Hong Kong predicted Hong Kong
Treatment Effect
Placebo tests
Treated Controls
Treated Time Controls
Robustness checks
Leave One Out Robustness Check
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call