Abstract

Despite the lack of sufficient information on the safety of herbal products, their use as alternative and/or complementary medicine is globally popular. There is also an increasing interest in medicinal herbs as precursor for pharmacological actives. Of serious concern is the concurrent consumption of herbal products and conventional drugs. Herb–drug interaction (HDI) is the single most important clinical consequence of this practice. Using a structured assessment procedure, the evidence of HDI presents with varying degree of clinical significance. While the potential for HDI for a number of herbal products is inferred from non-human studies, certain HDIs are well established through human studies and documented case reports. Various mechanisms of pharmacokinetic HDI have been identified and include the alteration in the gastrointestinal functions with consequent effects on drug absorption; induction and inhibition of metabolic enzymes and transport proteins; and alteration of renal excretion of drugs and their metabolites. Due to the intrinsic pharmacologic properties of phytochemicals, pharmacodynamic HDIs are also known to occur. The effects could be synergistic, additive, and/or antagonistic. Poor reporting on the part of patients and the inability to promptly identify HDI by health providers are identified as major factors limiting the extensive compilation of clinically relevant HDIs. A general overview and the significance of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic HDI are provided, detailing basic mechanism, and nature of evidence available. An increased level of awareness of HDI is necessary among health professionals and drug discovery scientists. With the increasing number of plant-sourced pharmacological actives, the potential for HDI should always be assessed in the non-clinical safety assessment phase of drug development process. More clinically relevant research is also required in this area as current information on HDI is insufficient for clinical applications.

Highlights

  • There is increasing consumptions of medicinal herbs and herbal products globally, cutting across social and racial classes, as it is observed both in developing and developed countries (Cheng et al, 2002; Bodeker, 2007; Mitra, 2007)

  • Herbal products are made of complex mixture of pharmacologically active phytochemicals (Mok and Chau, 2006), most of which are secondary metabolites generated through the shikimate, acetate–malonate, and acetate–mevalonate pathways

  • CLINICAL PRESENTATION OF HERB–DRUG INTERACTIONS Clinical presentations of Herb–drug interaction (HDI) vary widely depending on the herbs and the drugs concerned

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

There is increasing consumptions of medicinal herbs and herbal products globally, cutting across social and racial classes, as it is observed both in developing and developed countries (Cheng et al, 2002; Bodeker, 2007; Mitra, 2007). 49.4% of Israeli consumers of herbal remedies use them with prescription drugs (Giveon et al, 2004) This is significant bearing in mind that less than 40% of patients disclose their herbal supplement usage to their health care providers coupled with the fact that many physicians are unaware of the potential risks of herb–drug interactions (HDI; Klepser et al, 2000). Herbal products are made of complex mixture of pharmacologically active phytochemicals (Mok and Chau, 2006), most of which are secondary metabolites generated through the shikimate, acetate–malonate, and acetate–mevalonate pathways These constituents include phenolics (such as tannins, lignins, quinolones, and salicylates), phenolic glycosides (such as flavonoids, cyanogens, and glucosinolates), terpenoids (such as sesquiterpenes, steroids, carotenoids, saponins, and iridoids), alkaloids, peptides, polysaccharides (such as gums and mucilages), resins, and essential oils which often contain some of the aforementioned classes of phytochemicals (Wills et al, 2000; Wang et al, 2008). Searches were not limited by date or place of publications but to publications available in English language

RESULTS
Limitations to clinical inferences
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call