Abstract
The existing US interstate ecological system can be divided into three categories according to the subject: traditional government governance, inter-governmental cooperation and special organizational governance. Traditional ecological a government-led public governance, that is, the use of public power. US interstate eco-governance includes administrative control-led environmental regulation, legislative legislative ecological behavior, and judicial system environmental litigation ruling. Interstate issues are essentially intergovernmental relationships, so inter-governmental cooperation mechanisms are the proper meaning of interstate ecological governance. Traditional interstate agreements and central government cooperation are two common ways of interstate cooperation governance. The special organization the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), which a company based in the United States. It a state-owned company that was established in May 1933 in accordance with the Tennessee Valley Authority Act. Formal operation, it a regional comprehensive and comprehensive development plan, is the first organized attempt in the history of the United States to skillfully arrange the fate of the entire basin and its residents. The US interstate ecological system effective and relevant. The system that basically meets the requirements of multi-center plays an active role in dealing with interstate ecological environmental disputes and protection. China and the United States have certain similarities in the field of ecological governance. On the basis of national conditions, China's cross-regional ecological can learn from the US's experience to achieve good governance of cross-regional ecological problems.
Highlights
The collaborative governance of interstate ecological affairs in the United States, a country with a vast territory and a federal system, has always been the federal government and states’ concerned issues
The existing US interstate ecological governance system can be divided into three categories by governance subject: traditional government governance, inter-governmental cooperation governance and special organizational governance
There are two enlightenments of interstate ecological governance in America on the "good governance" of cross-regional ecology in China: at the macro level, it is enlightened that China's cross-regional ecological governance should realize the unification of traditional environmental regulation and inter-governmental cooperation governance
Summary
The collaborative governance of interstate ecological affairs in the United States, a country with a vast territory and a federal system, has always been the federal government and states’ concerned issues. They have explored a number of more effective governance ways and experience in practice. The existing US interstate ecological governance system can be divided into three categories by governance subject: traditional government governance (law-making, law enforcement, administration of justice), inter-governmental cooperation governance and special organizational governance. This article strives to take a more comprehensive consideration of interstate governance system in the United States and summarize the essence of this system’s effective operation by reviewing the governance practices of different subjects
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
