Abstract

This paper proposes an optimization-based framework to determine the type of nonlinear model present and identify its parameters. The objective in this optimization problem is to identify the parameters of a nonlinear model by minimizing the differences between the experimental and analytical responses at the measured coordinates of the nonlinear structure. The application of the method is demonstrated on a clamped beam subjected to a nonlinear electromagnetic force. In the proposed method, the assumption is that the form of nonlinear force is not known. For this reason, one may assume that any nonlinear force can be described using a Taylor series expansion. In this paper, four different possible nonlinear forms are assumed to model the electromagnetic force. The parameters of these four nonlinear models are identified from experimental data obtained from a series of stepped-sine vibration tests with constant acceleration base excitation. It is found that a nonlinear model consisting of linear damping and linear, quadratic, cubic, and fifth order stiffness provides excellent agreement between the predicted responses and the corresponding measured responses. It is also shown that adding a quadratic nonlinear damping does not lead to a significant improvement in the results.

Highlights

  • Mathematical models have been increasingly used in nonlinear structural dynamics

  • This paper has proposed a framework for nonlinear model identification

  • The nonlinear element/force was represented by a Taylor series expansion

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mathematical models have been increasingly used in nonlinear structural dynamics. The type of nonlinearity and the parameters of these nonlinear models need to be identified from experimental data. This is mainly due to the lack of knowledge about the mechanism of the nonlinearity in structures while in service. There has been considerable interest in nonlinear model identification using vibration test data. The identified mathematical model should be capable of predicting the real-life behavior of an unknown structure, and must be physically meaningful. Having a valid physical model in the identification process using experimental data will lead to more reliable and meaningful identified parameters

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call