Abstract
Various uncertainty metrics have been applicable to measure reliability under aleatory uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty, including evidence-theory-based reliability, interval-analysis-based reliability, fuzzy-interval-analysis-based reliability, posbist reliability and belief reliability. Difficulties arise, however, when an attempt is made to solve one specific situation by implementing one of these methods since the evaluating results may be different from each other. It is unconvinced to choose one method merely based on the qualitative analysis. Therefore, this paper proposes an optimal evaluation model to conduct an objective evaluation on these metrics and provide reasonable decision-making proposals. An evaluating index system is established on the feature analysis of these metrics. Cooke classical model has been adopted to weigh experts’ performance and improve the objectivity of the quantification results. Considering both evaluation indexes and requirements from the demanding sides, an optimal model is introduced based on data envelopment analysis. Numerical examples are subsequently conducted to illustrate the evaluating methods. The proposed model was found to outperform alternative methods in terms of objectivity and ability to provide reasonable decision-making suggestions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.