Abstract

This paper presents a solver for the CFD (computational fluid dynamics) modeling of catalytic chambers in monopropellant thrusters based on the open-source OpenFOAM® (Open Field Operation and Manipulation) framework. A model was formulated and used to simulate the physical and thermochemical processes taking place inside the catalytic chambers of the monopropellant thrusters. The code integrates reacting gas flow in porous media, with mass and heat transport. The most important implemented functionalities were the separation of two reactive gases, one transient reactive gas flowing between the catalyst bed interstices (interstitial gas), and another static reactive gas on the surface of catalyst particles, or pellets (surface gas). Homogeneous and heterogeneous reactions occur on the interstitial gas and the catalyst particle, respectively. A flexible definition of porous properties, a calculation of multicomponent diffusion-flux mass, a diffusion mass coeffcient, a mass transfer coeffcient, and a heat transfer coeffcient were implemented as well. Experimental and analytical studies about hydrazine monopropellant thrusters in the literature were used to the case tests and verification of the solver. Temperature and mass fraction fields were simulated and compared. The results of the temperature profile are in agreement with experimental and theoretical studies found in the literature, and mass fraction presents some differences.

Highlights

  • Low thrust propulsion systems are fundamental in different operations of a small spacecraft (Han et al 2009)

  • Temperature plotted in function of time at a fixed axial position of 36.57 mm inside the catalytic chamber is shown in Figs. 4, 5, and 6 for the initial bed temperatures, set to 294.4 K, 527.7 K, and 788.8 K, 36.57 K corresponding to a point in the symmetry axis

  • Physical and thermochemical properties of the flow in a porous media can be included in the code

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Low thrust propulsion systems are fundamental in different operations of a small spacecraft (Han et al 2009). There are three different types of technologies: cold gas, electric, and liquid monopropellant propulsion systems. A considerable amount of literature has been published, in which comparison about these propulsion systems, stating the advantages and drawbacks of each, can be found (Tummala and Dutta 2017; Lemmer 2017; Garrigues and Coche 2011; Martinez-Sanchez and Pollard 1998; Sutton and Biblarz 2016). Liquid monopropellant thrusters are the most commonly used type of propulsion systems for in-space missions. In comparison to electric thrusters, the liquid monopropellant ones have the advantages to have easy design and relatively high thrust, and, quick response in maneuvers. Profitability and high specific impulse are the main advantages compared to cold gas thrusters

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call