An Objective Scoring Method for Evaluating the Comparative Performance of Automated Storm Identification and Tracking Algorithms

Abstract

Abstract While storm identification and tracking algorithms are used both operationally and in research, there exists no single standard technique to objectively determine performance of such algorithms. Thus, a comparative skill score is developed herein that consists of four parameters, three of which constitute the quantification of storm attributes—size consistency, linearity of tracks, and mean track duration—and the fourth that correlates performance to an optimal postevent reanalysis. The skill score is a cumulative sum of each of the parameters normalized from zero to one among the compared algorithms, such that a maximum skill score of four can be obtained. The skill score is intended to favor algorithms that are efficient at severe storm detection, i.e., high-scoring algorithms should detect storms that have higher current or future severe threat and minimize detection of weaker, short-lived storms with low severe potential. The skill score is shown to be capable of successfully ranking a large number of algorithms, both between varying settings within the same base algorithm and between distinct base algorithms. Through a comparison with manually created user datasets, high-scoring algorithms are verified to match well with hand analyses, demonstrating appropriate calibration of skill score parameters. Significance Statement With the growing number of options for storm identification and tracking techniques, it is necessary to devise an objective approach to quantify performance of different techniques. This study introduces a comparative skill score that assesses size consistency, linearity of tracks, mean track duration, and correlation to an optimal postevent reanalysis to rank diverse algorithms. This paper will show the capability of the skill score at highlighting algorithms that are efficient at detecting storms with higher severe potential, as well as those that closely resemble human-perceived storms through a comparison with manually created user datasets. The novel methodology will be useful in improving systems that rely on such algorithms, for both operational and research purposes focusing on severe storm detection.