An objective hypospadias classification system

Abstract

Current approaches to classifying hypospadias severity are based on meatus position. These classification tools lack precise reflection on the degree of urethral hypoplasia and extent of urethral underdevelopment hence are not good representative of hypospadias severity. Here, an alternative classification system is introduced that objectively reflects the developmental pathology underlying this condition. The study goal was to appraise location of bifurcation in the corpus spongiosum (BCS) relative to the penile shaft as an indicator of hypospadias severity. Patients aged <18 years with primary hypospadias were included in the study. Urethral defect ratio (UDR) was calculated by dividing the extent of urethral defect (distance between the glandular knobs and BCS) relative to stretched penile length (SPL). Hypospadias severity was then categorized into three distinct grades (UDR <0.5, 0.5-0.99, ≥1.0). The Inter-Class Correlation (ICC) was evaluated to assess the intra- and inter-rater agreement between the reviewers of UDC ratio. Linear regression analysis was performed to estimate the correlation between UDC ratios and either plate objective scoring tool (POST) and Curvature degrees. A total of 67 patients aged 12.3±3.7 months with primary hypospadias were enrolled. UDR ranged between 0.2 and 1.3. A significant difference in hypospadias level was observed between UDR grades, which further correlated degree of curvature (P<0.0001), urethral plate quality (P<0.0001), and associated anomalies (P<0.05). The Inter-Class Correlation (ICC) value to examine the intra- and inter-rater agreement between the two reviewers in UDC ratio was 0.998 (95% CI 0.998, 0.999). Regression analysis revealed that UDR and both POST and Curvature degree were significantly associated (P<0.001). A hypospadias severity scoring system based on embryological etiology and urethral hypoplasia and assessed relative to the penile shaft represents an objective, feasible, and consistent tool. These results clearly indicate that the reviewers have had excellent consistency/reliability across their consecutive readings. This new system can facilitate objective description of hypospadias-spectrum anomalies and thus support precise communication between individual surgeons and centers.