Abstract

An objective, computer-controlled test battery was developed for measuring the effects of hearing protection devices (HPDs) and TCAPS, on auditory situational awareness (ASA). Four independent ASA tasks with military relevance were tested: Detection-Recognition/Identification-Localization-Communication (DRILCOM). Detection employed threshold-shift with seven 1/3-octave bands, an AK-47 burst, and rifle cocking. Detection signals emanated from in front of the subject (0 degrees), or at 90, 180, or 270 degrees, to evaluate directionality. The Recognition/Identification task employed 36 signals combined in triads, wherein one “target” sound from 0 or 90 degrees had to be identified, at S/N ratios of -10, 0, and + 10. Localization employed a dissonant pure tone chord, spanning 104-7880 Hz, which provided interaural time and interaural level cuing. Localization entailed 360-degrees of azimuth in 30-degree increments, and 30-degrees in frontal elevation, at a S/N of + 10. The Communications task, addressing pass-through communications, utilized QuickSIN messages from 4 directions. In a proof-of-concept experiment on 10 subjects, 2 in-ear TCAPS, 1 earmuff TCAPS, a passive Combat Arms Earplug in “open” setting, and an EB-15LE™ electronic earplug were tested, as well as the open ear. DRILCOM demonstrated sensitivity to performance differences among devices and the open ear, as well as diagnosticity to within-device performance differences across different ASA tasks. The results have implication for selection and deployment of TCAPS and HPDs.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call