Abstract
SINCE when two samples from a population are combined we get a larger and more representative sample, the iterative process could, in effect, be considered as a means of obtaining a larger sample starting from a small one. As the distribution curve F2 is derived from the mean values of the frequencies in F and F1, that is, (F + F1)/2, the result of the combination of two sets of data, namely, the actual curve obtained from n experiments and its Gaussian counterpart, may be regarded as being representative of 2n experimental observations (Fig. 1). On the same basis, we may regard F3 (derived from F2 and F1) as representing 3n experimental observations and F4, 5n experimental observations. Thus the sample size may be considered as increasing in the following sequence, namely, n, n, 2n, 3n, 5n, … 89n, … corresponding to F, F1, F2, F3, F4, …, F10 and so forth. The (n + 1)th term in this sequence is given by We have since found that a more rational procedure would be to use instead of to get F2, instead of to get F3, and so forth. The results obtained by this modification are, however, not significantly different from those obtained previously. But the latter procedure may be considered more logical as indicative of the increase in equivalent sample size.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have