Abstract
Abstract Viscosity measurements have frequently been made with rubber, and very many suggestions have been put forward to explain the cause of the changes of viscosity in rubber solutions. According to Staudinger (Kautschuk, 5, 128 (1929)), if measured under certain conditions, e. g., in dilute solutions where no irregularities are found, the viscosity can be used as a measure of the molecular weight of the dissolved substance. Fickentscher and Mark (Kolloid-Z., 49, 140 (1929)) even calculate from viscosity measurements the length of the molecule and hence relative molecular weights. It is well known that the viscosities of rubber solutions differ greatly and that mechanical treatment of the rubber decreases the viscosity of its solutions to a very large extent. The latter effect has been explained by Staudinger as well as by Fickentscher and Mark (loc. cit.) as a depolymerization. The latter authors calculate that the molecular weight of rubber decreases to one-third of the original if it is masticated for 225 minutes. It has further been pointed out recently by Herschel and Bulkley (Kolloid-Z., 39, 291 (1926)) that rubber solutions show irregularities in their viscosity, e. g., the viscosity is not linearly proportional to the pressure. (According to Poiseuille's formula for the rate of flow of a liquid through a capillary, the viscosity coefficient:
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
