Abstract

The high level of surface roughness of additively manufactured parts post challenges to the applicability of different dimensional measurement techniques, including tactile, optical and X-ray computed tomography. Tactile measurement is traditionally considered to have the best accuracy and traceability; however, its measurement can be significantly influenced by the mechanical filtering effect. This work investigates the influence of the mechanical filtering effect on tactile measurements of additively manufactured parts. Both experimental and simulation work are utilised to reveal this effect. Particularly the numerical simulation based on the morphological method allows a single influence factor e.g. the stylus diameter to be investigated. The maximum measurement errors caused by the stylus mechanical filtering effect are determined by the convex hull points of the measurement profile, which is equivalent to using an infinitely large stylus. Coordinate measuring machine and X-ray computed tomography measurement results of an additively manufactured test part’s cylinder diameters are compared, along with the application of morphological method to “compensate” the coordinate measuring machine’s mechanical filtering effect.

Highlights

  • Building up a component layer by layer, via additive manufacturing (AM), allows the construction of complex geometries not possible with conventional manufacturing processes

  • This paper systematically evaluates the influence of the mechanical filtering effect on dimensional measurement of AM processed components, while the exploration of X-ray computed tomography (XCT) filtering effect is scheduled for a separate publication

  • “XCT1 Diam”, “XCT2 Diam” and “XCT3 Diam” in Table 6 refer to the external cylinder diameters resulted from the raw XCT measurement, the XCT data modified by applying the morphological method with the disk probe diameter 3 mm and the XCT data modified by applying the morphological method with the infinite large disk probe diameter

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Building up a component layer by layer, via additive manufacturing (AM), allows the construction of complex geometries not possible with conventional manufacturing processes. Aloisi and Carmignato (2016) provided an experimental investigation on the influence of surface roughness on XCT dimensional measurements of AM parts They found that the deviations between CMM and XCT in measuring AM cylinder diameters are approximately Rz/2. Carmignato et al (2017) further conducted a simulation study to investigate the XCT’s filtering effect on dimensional measurements of components with rough surfaces, which shows that the mean deviations (between leastsquares diameters and reference diameters of simulated cylinders) of 2Rp take place independently from surface roughness; the authors investigated the influences of voxel sizes, XCT surface determination algorithms, focus spot and fitting operations on dimensional measurements.

Mechanical filtering effect
Measurement results
Findings
Simulation: varying surface roughness
Conclusion and future work
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call