Abstract

We investigate the MSHT20 global PDF sets, demonstrating the effects of varying the strong coupling alpha _S(M_Z^2) and the masses of the charm and bottom quarks. We determine the preferred value, and accompanying uncertainties, when we allow alpha _S(M_Z^2) to be a free parameter in the MSHT20 global analyses of deep-inelastic and related hard scattering data, at both NLO and NNLO in QCD perturbation theory. We also study the constraints on alpha _S(M_Z^2) which come from the individual data sets in the global fit by repeating the NNLO and NLO global analyses at various fixed values of alpha _S(M_Z^2), spanning the range alpha _S(M_Z^2)=0.108 to 0.130 in units of 0.001. We make all resulting PDFs sets available. We find that the best fit values are alpha _S(M_Z^2)=0.1203pm 0.0015 and 0.1174pm 0.0013 at NLO and NNLO respectively. We investigate the relationship between the variations in alpha _S(M_Z^2) and the uncertainties on the PDFs, and illustrate this by calculating the cross sections for key processes at the LHC. We also perform fits where we allow the heavy quark masses m_c and m_b to vary away from their default values and make PDF sets available in steps of Delta m_c =0.05~mathrm GeV and Delta m_b =0.25~mathrm GeV, using the pole mass definition of the quark masses. As for varying alpha _S(M_Z^2) values, we present the variation in the PDFs and in the predictions. We examine the comparison to data, particularly the HERA data on charm and bottom cross sections and note that our default values are very largely compatible with best fits to data. We provide PDF sets with 3 and 4 active quark flavours, as well as the standard value of 5 flavours.

Highlights

  • We investigate the MSHT20 global PDF sets, demonstrating the effects of varying the strong coupling αS (

  • We study the constraints on αS(MZ2 ) which come from the individual data sets in the global fit by repeating the NNLO and NLO global analyses at various fixed values of αS

  • We examine the comparison to data, the HERA data on charm and bottom cross sections and note that our default values are very largely compatible with best fits to data

Read more

Summary

TeV High-mass Drell-Yan and ATLAS 8 TeV Z data χ 2 profiles minimise in

0.128 region, though in some cases the profiles are rather flat in the vicinity of the minima. 14.3 at this is achieved for mt = 163.7 GeV, an unrealistically low pole mass value, and as αS(MZ2 ) decreases mt has to decrease further in order to try to maintain the fit quality It was noted in [1] that at NLO a number of data sets were fit poorly, and the tttotal cross section is one of these, with large NNLO corrections missing from the cross section calculation. The changes in the gluon PDF lie notably outside the uncertainty bands of the αS(MZ2 ) = 0.118 central fit The reason for this difference is that at lower scales the gluon PDF is more sensitive to the larger variations in the low scale αS(Q2) value.

Benchmark cross sections
W and Z production
Top-quark pair production
Higgs boson production
Choice of the range of heavy-quark masses
Dependence on mc
Dependence on mb
Changes in the PDFs
Effect on benchmark cross sections
PDFs in three- and four-flavour-number-schemes
PDF set availability
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.