Abstract

Applicants use faking in selection interviews to create a favorable impression and to increase their chances for a job offer. Theoretical models assume that such a behavior is influenced by situational and dispositional variables. However, previous research has mainly focused on dispositional variables whereas research about situational variables is sparse. To address this gap, we conducted three studies in which we examined how competition for a job and warning interviewees that information from their answers will be verified can influence faking intentions. Furthermore, we wanted to know whether these situational variables are able to explain additional variance in faking intentions beyond dispositional variables and whether there are interactions between situational and dispositional variables. In Study 1, we only found that high competition led to slightly higher faking intentions than low competition in a student sample. In Study 2, only a warning about the verification of applicants’ answers led to slightly lower faking intentions compared to no warning concerning verification in a working sample. Furthermore, faking intentions were lower in Study 2 than in the student sample in Study 1. In Study 3, we found no impact of our situational variables in a combined sample of students and non-students. We only found slightly higher honest impression management intentions in the high competition and the verification warning condition. We also found hardly any support for interaction effects between the situational and dispositional variables. Furthermore, the situational variables did not explain additional variance beyond the dispositional variables in any of the three studies. Possible reasons for the non-significant or small effect sizes for the situational variables can be found in a qualitative analysis of answers to an open-ended question in Study 3. However, we found that Honesty-humility und all facets of the Dark Triad were related to faking intentions. These results indicate that dispositional variables in particular have an impact on faking intentions.

Highlights

  • Most applicants try to put their best foot forward in selection interviews to increase their chances to get a job offer

  • To check whether our experimental manipulations worked as intended, we computed two separate t-tests with the independent variables competition and verification warning with the corresponding dependent variables perceived competition and perceived verification from the manipulation check

  • As expected and in contrast to the results for faking, we found higher honest impression management (IM) intentions in a high competition condition compared to a low competition condition

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most applicants try to put their best foot forward in selection interviews to increase their chances to get a job offer. Honest and deceptive impression management are Situational and Dispositional Faking Antecedents very prevalent and previous studies found that up to 99% of the applicants use corresponding impression management tactics in selection interviews (Levashina and Campion, 2007; Bourdage et al, 2018). The first aim of the present paper was to examine the impact of two relevant situational factors on impression management (IM). To evaluate whether these situational factors can explain variance in IM beyond the effects of dispositional factors and whether there are interactions between situational and dispositional variables, we collected information on personality antecedents. Honest IM contains the subfacets honest self-promotion (emphasizing existing job-related competences), honest ingratiation (talking about common values and opinions), and honest defensive IM (giving honest explanations for past failures and resulting learning experiences) (Bourdage et al, 2018)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call