Abstract
The criteria for evaluating the robustness of parallel numerical integration algorithms are discussed and several integration algorithms are examined. The results show that the central difference method has high computational efficiency and parallel effectiveness in the case of a diagonal mass and damping matrix and is recommended in such a case. A comparison is also made between the Cholesky decomposition method and a mixed Jacobi/Gauss-Seidel method when they are incorporated in the central difference method for the case of a nondiagonal mass matrix. The results indicate that iterative methods are attractive in parallel computation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
