An investigation of non-informative priors for Bayesian dose-response modeling

Abstract

Toxicology analyses are built around dose-response modeling, and increasingly these methodologies utilize Bayesian estimation techniques. Bayesian estimation is unique because it includes prior distributional information in the analysis, which may impact the dose-response estimate meaningfully. As such analyses are often used for human health risk assessment, the practitioner must understand the impact of adding prior information to the dose-response study. One proposal in the literature is the use of the flat uniform prior distribution, which places a uniform prior probability over the dose-response model's parameters for a chosen range of values. Though the motivation of such a prior distribution is laudable in that it is most like maximum likelihood estimation seeking unbiased estimates of the dose-response, one can show that such priors add information and may introduce unexpected biases into the analysis. This manuscript shows through numerous empirical examples why prior distributions that are non-informative across all endpoints of interest do not exist for dose-response models; that is, other quantities of interest will be informed by choosing one inferential quantity not informed.