Abstract
Precipitation estimation by weather radars in Alaska is challenging. In this study, we investigate National Weather Service (NWS) precipitation products that are produced from the seven NEXRAD radar sites in Alaska. The NWS precipitation processing subsystem generates stages of data at each NEXRAD site which are then input to the weather forecast office to generate a regionwide precipitation product. Data from the NEXRAD sites and the operational rain gauges in the weather forecast region are used to produce this regionwide product that is then sent to the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) to be included in the NCEP Stage IV distribution. The NCEP Stage IV product for Alaska has been available since 2017. We use the United States Climate Reference Network (USCRN) data from Alaska to compare to the NCEP Stage IV data. Given that the USCRN can be used in the production of the NCEP Stage IV data for Alaska, we also used the NEXRAD Digital Precipitation Array (DPA) that is generated at the site for comparison of the radar-only products. Comparing the NEXRAD-based data from Alaska to the USCRN gauge estimates using the USCRN site information on air temperature, we are able to condition the analysis based on the hourly or 6-hourly average air temperature. The estimates in the frozen phase of precipitation largely underestimate as compared to the gauge, and the correlation is low with larger errors as compared to other phases of precipitation. In the mixed phase the underestimation of precipitation improves, but the correlation is still low with relatively large errors as compared to the rain phases of precipitation. The difficulties in precipitation estimation in cold temperatures are well known and we show the evaluation for the NCEP Stage IV regional data for Alaska and the NEXRAD site specific Digital Precipitation Array (DPA) data. Results show the challenges of estimating mixed-phase and frozen precipitation. However, the DPA data shows somewhat better performance in the mixed precipitation phase, which suggests that the NWS Precipitation Processing Subsystem (PPS) is tuned to the climatology as it relates to precipitation in Alaska.
Highlights
Sensing precipitation in high latitudes is difficult due to complex terrain, snow and frozen phase estimation, limited power grid availability, etc. [1]
We present an investigation into the NEXRAD-based precipitation products that are available for Alaska
The products we evaluate are the hourly Digital Precipitation Array (DPA), the 6-hourly DPA, and the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Stage IV 6-hourly precipitation, which are compared to the hourly United States Climate Reference Network (USCRN) in situ network of precipitation and temperature observations
Summary
Sensing precipitation in high latitudes is difficult due to complex terrain, snow and frozen phase estimation, limited power grid availability, etc. [1]. Sensing precipitation in high latitudes is difficult due to complex terrain, snow and frozen phase estimation, limited power grid availability, etc. [4] performed similar analyses using CloudSat and MRMS highresolution quantitative precipitation and found very similar results except that MRMS compares very well within 100 km of the radar site. They narrowed their analysis as compared to [3] based on temperature by calling 0–2 ◦ C mixed phase and below 0 ◦ C snow
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
