Abstract

This study investigated 59 Mainland China high school biology teachers’ attitudes toward and ethical reasoning of three socioscientific issues (SSI), including genetic modification, gene therapy, and assisted reproductive technology using a survey with open-ended questions. The results indicated that the teachers’ attitudes toward the three bioethical issues are influenced by the SSI contexts. Male teachers appeared more supportive than female teachers regarding the use of these biotechnologies. Analysis of the teachers’ ethical reasoning of the bioethical issues demonstrated that while most of the teachers could view these issues over the long term, they also encountered difficulties in considering these problems from a more national or global perspective or by taking multiple ethical frameworks into account. The implications of this study for promoting biology teachers’ development of ethical reasoning skills and practices in SSI-based instruction are discussed.

Highlights

  • The need to enhance secondary school students’ advanced ethical reasoning and decision-making skills on socioscientific issues (SSI) through science education has been broadly recognized in recent years (Sadler et al 2006)

  • The results of this study were reported in terms of (1) Teachers’ attitudes towards the three bioethical issues, and (2) Patterns of teachers’ ethical reasoning

  • Teachers’ attitudes towards the three bioethical issues Overall, the teachers tended to view the applications of GM, GT, and ART positively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The need to enhance secondary school students’ advanced ethical reasoning and decision-making skills on socioscientific issues (SSI) through science education has been broadly recognized in recent years (Sadler et al 2006). Science education should focus on promoting students’ abilities to take part in social discussions and discourses regarding SSI in the near future to achieve scientific literacy and citizenship. In response to this need, there is a growing call for the inclusion of SSI and moral discussions in science education in secondary schools (e.g., Driver et al 2000; Chen and So Asia-Pacific Science Education (2017) 3:1

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call