Abstract
This paper investigates the inherent variability in the results of matched-field geoacoustic inversion algorithms. This algorithm-induced variability must be considered when interpreting inversion results in terms of environmental changes as a function of time or space. Fast simulated annealing (FSA), genetic algorithms (GA), and a hybrid algorithm (adaptive simplex simulated annealing; ASSA) are compared by performing multiple inversions of benchmark synthetic data (noise free and noisy) and acoustic data measured over both low- and high-speed sea-bed sediments in the MAPEX 2000 experiment. ASSA produced the lowest variability in inversion results for all cases, followed by GA and FSA. For the high-speed MAPEX 2000 case, the variability is essentially negligible, while for the low-speed case the variability is significant as compared with environmental variations reported in the literature.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
