Abstract
This paper reconciles the controversy regarding the substitutability between equity REITs (EREITs) and mortgage REITs (MREITs) in existing literature. Using CRSP/Ziman data from 1992 to 2011, we show that the driving economic factors on EREIT returns are different from those driving MREIT returns, which rejects the substitutability hypothesis. Additional tests confirm that causality runs unilaterally from EREITs to MREITs, implying the leading (subordinate) role of EREITs (MREITs). Finally, EREITs and MREITs possess disparate risk and return profiles under the full and sub-periods. In sum, strong evidence reveals that EREITs and MREITs are in fact not substitutable.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
