An investigation into the reliability and methodology of the Linburg-Comstock anomaly clinical test

Abstract

Study DesignThis is a cross-sectional study. IntroductionAn intertendinous connection between the flexor pollicis longus (FPL) and index flexor digitorum profundus (IFDP) tendons causes involuntary index flexion during active thumb flexion and has been named the Linburg-Comstock anomaly (LCA). It may become symptomatic or cause functional limitations. Literature has documented the prevalence to range from 13% to 70%. Cadaver studies have reported an anatomical connection in 5% to 25%. PurposeThis study aimed to examine the methodology and reliability of the LCA clinical diagnostic test and to explore the wide range of reported incidence and the discrepancy between cadaver and subject prevalence. MethodsTwo examiners observed for the presence of involuntary index flexion during 3 separate variations of thumb flexion in 67 subjects (134 limbs); results were considered positive if involuntary flexion occurred at either index interphalangeal joint. Intertester reliability was assessed using Cohen's kappa coefficient. The volar forearm and wrist of 53 cadavers (106 limbs) were dissected and assessed for an observable and mechanical tendinous connection between the FPL and IFDP tendons. ResultsPrevalence for subjects (5%-32%) was at the lower end of the range of previously reported values; results differed with altering thumb flexion motion. Observation for the presence of an intertendinous connection between the FPL and IFDP tendons in cadaver specimens (23%) fell within previously reported ranges. Intertester reliability coefficients ranged from no to weak agreement and varied according to specific thumb flexion motion performed during the test. ConclusionsThe identification of index finger flexion during thumb flexion varied both with thumb flexion motions and with whether flexion was assessed at the index proximal interphalangeal or distal interphalangeal joint. Intertester reliability was low for all variations of the LCA clinical test performed. The wide range in previously reported LCA incidence may be due to variability in testing procedure, and there is a need to establish a reliable and valid clinical test for this potentially symptomatic anatomic anomaly.