Abstract

ABSTRACT Critical thinking and problem solving are widely recognised as valuable competencies in the twenty-first century, and indispensable skills in the workplace. In this context, we investigate the strategies employed by first-year university mathematics students when faced with a non-routine task, specifically the impossible triangle. The data collection process involved the administration of a questionnaire (70 questionnaire responses) and conducting interviews (six interviews). The study used the lens of framing to examine the interplay between the task cue and students' responses, and the Ref*AER framework to interpret the knowledge of the participants. A considerable number of students approached the task using an algorithmic mathematical frame. With reference to the Ref*AER framework, the participants' inadequate conceptions were a hindrance to the successful completion of the task. We believe that the implementation of tasks like the impossible triangle in the mathematics classroom can effectively foster students' noticing and uncover deficiencies in their knowledge.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call