Abstract

ObjectivesThe development of frailty tools from electronically recorded healthcare data allows frailty assessments to be routinely generated, potentially beneficial for individuals and healthcare providers. We wished to assess the predictive validity of a frailty index (FI) derived from interRAI Community Health Assessment (CHA) for outcomes in older adults residing in retirement villages (RVs), elsewhere called continuing care retirement communities.DesignProspective cohort study.Setting and participants34 RVs across two district health boards in Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ). 577 participants, mean age 81 years; 419 (73%) female; 410 (71%) NZ European, 147 (25%) other European, 8 Asian (1%), 7 Māori (1%), 1 Pasifika (<1%), 4 other (<1%).MethodsinterRAI-CHA FI tool was used to stratify participants into fit (0–0.12), mild (>0.12–0.24), moderate (>0.24–0.36) and severe (>0.36) frail groups at baseline (the latter two grouped due to low numbers of severely frail). Primary outcome was acute hospitalization; secondary outcomes included long-term care (LTC) entry and mortality. The relationship between frailty and outcomes were explored with multivariable Cox regression, estimating hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs).ResultsOver mean follow-up of 2.5 years, 33% (69/209) of fit, 58% (152/260) mildly frail and 79% (85/108) moderate-severely frail participants at baseline had at least one acute hospitalization. Compared to the fit group, significantly increased risk of acute hospitalization were identified in mildly frail (adjusted HR = 1.88, 95%CI = 1.41–2.51, p<0.001) and moderate-severely frail (adjusted HR = 3.52, 95%CI = 2.53–4.90, p<0.001) groups. Similar increased risk in moderate-severely frail participants was seen in LTC entry (adjusted HR = 5.60 95%CI = 2.47–12.72, p<0.001) and mortality (adjusted HR = 5.06, 95%CI = 1.71–15.02, p = 0.003).Conclusions and implicationsThe FI derived from interRAI-CHA has robust predictive validity for acute hospitalization, LTC entry and mortality. This adds to the growing literature of use of interRAI tools in this way and may assist healthcare providers with rapid identification of frailty.

Highlights

  • The number of retirement villages (RVs), known elsewhere as continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs), has grown significantly over recent years in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) [1]

  • Compared to the fit group, significantly increased risk of acute hospitalization were identified in mildly frail and moderateseverely frail groups

  • Similar increased risk in moderate-severely frail participants was seen in long-term residential care (LTC) entry and mortality

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The number of retirement villages (RVs), known elsewhere as continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs), has grown significantly over recent years in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) [1]. While few RVs existed in the 1980s, approximately 14% of those aged 75 years or older were living in RVs in 2019 [1]. The perceived availability of health and care supports is one of several deciding factors for relocation to RVs identified in those financially able to choose RV lifestyles [2, 3]. Our earlier research suggests many residing in RVs live with considerable unmet health needs and symptoms [2, 4], and may represent those with greater dependency than their community-dwelling peers. Consistent with this, some frail older adults perceive RV living as an alternative to LTC [5]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call