An international comparison of ethical reasoning abilities: Accounting students from Ireland and the United States

Abstract

Abstract Accountants are often confronted with ethical decisions. Yet, some prior research indicates that both public accountants and accounting students in the U.S. may not have as high a level of moral reasoning as other professionals. One measure of moral reasoning ability is the Principled score, or P score, as determined by the Defining Issues Test. Prior research on accounting professionals and students using this measure has largely been confined to the U.S. This study compares the ethical reasoning abilities of American and Irish accounting students. We find that the mean P scores of American and Irish students are similar. However, gender and liberal/conservative attitudes are significant explanatory variables for moral reasoning ability across countries. In addition, our results show that students do correctly self-assess their moral reasoning abilities. We also find that those students with the lowest levels of moral reasoning abilities are the least likely to favor required ethics training in accounting programs. This may imply that students most in need of ethical training are less likely to seek this training.