An International Classification of Function, Disability and Health (ICF)-based investigation of movement impairment in women with pelvic organ prolapse.

Corlia Brandt,Elizabeth C Janse Van Vuuren

doi:10.4102/sajp.v75i1.472

Corlia Brandt, Elizabeth C Janse Van Vuuren

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v75i1.472

Copy DOI

Abstract

BackgroundThere is little evidence on movement impairment of the abdominal and pelvic floor muscles (PFM) in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP).ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine the movement impairments and interactions between the PFM and abdominal muscles in POP.MethodThe PFM and abdominal muscles of 100 conveniently sampled South African women with POP were assessed by ultrasonography, electromyography (EMG), the PERFECT scale, Sahrmann scale and a Pressure Biofeedback Unit (PBU). A demographic questionnaire determined contextual factors (exercise and medical history) and Visual Faces Scale pain intensities. Data were analysed descriptively and with Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients.ResultsParticipants (59 ± 9.31 years) were mostly unemployed (80%), physically inactive (85%), with comorbidities, heart or vascular disease, hypothyroidism and depression. The mean levator hiatus at rest (56.38 mm, standard deviation [SD] 9.95), thickness (5.1 mm, SD 1.41), amount of movement (4.28 mm, SD 6.84), strength (level 1.89, SD 1.13) and endurance (4.04 s, SD 3.32) of the PFM indicated dysfunction. Median values of zero were found for the Sahrmann scale (interquartile [IQ] range [0–1]) and PBU (IQ range [0–2]) and 10.95 µV for abdominal EMG (IQ range [7.9–17.8]). Pelvic floor muscle strength, endurance, movement and EMG activity correlation was fair (r > 0.4, p < 0.001), as was PFM strength, endurance and abdominal muscle function (r > 0.4, p < 0.05).ConclusionMovement impairment of local and global stability and mobility functions of PFM and abdominal muscles was present, as well as correlations between these functions. Addressing these impairments may affect the identified contextual factors (socio-economic, psychological and lifestyle factors) and the possible activity limitations and participation restrictions in patients with POP. Further research is needed to investigate these interactions.Clinical implicationsThe findings suggest that assessment and management of patients with POP might need to be based on a comprehensive neuro-musculoskeletal assessment and a holistic approach. Standardised protocols for patients with pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) should therefore be used with caution. Randomised controlled trials should investigate patient-specific and holistic intervention approaches.

Highlights

Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), such as pelvic organ prolapse (POP), is a multifactorial and under-investigated condition
The sample had an average age of 59 years and a median body mass index (BMI) of 28.67 kg/m2
Their lifestyles were characterised by an 80% unemployment rate, while 85% of the participants did not participate in any physical activity or exercise

Summary

Introduction

Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), such as pelvic organ prolapse (POP), is a multifactorial and under-investigated condition. Eleven per cent of women suffering from POP may need surgery, with 30% of these patients needing follow-up surgery within 2 years (Olsen et al 1997). Many women may have symptoms (such as urinary or faecal incontinence, pelvic pain and sexual dysfunction) for years, leading to adaptation of their lifestyle and physical activities (Wang et al 2012). Very little is known about the movement impairments and activity restrictions in women with POP in South Africa underlying these adaptations (Spitznagle et al 2017). There is little evidence on movement impairment of the abdominal and pelvic floor muscles (PFM) in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP)

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion