An interim analysis of a cohort study on the preoperative anxiety and postoperative behavioural changes in children having repeat anaesthetics

Abstract

Introduction Anxiety in the preoperative period and at induction of anaesthesia in children is associated with disturbances in postoperative behaviour 1-4). There is little work looking at the effects of repeat anaesthetic procedures on anxiety and subsequent postoperative behaviour disturbances. The aim of this study was to see if the effect of repeat anaesthetics was cumulative on postoperative behavioural problems and whether repeated anaesthetics provoke increasing anxiety. We investigated factors that may identify children who are susceptible to behavioural changes following repeat anaesthetics. We present an interim analysis of data on 8 patients as part of a long-term cohort study on 40 children with retinoblastoma who have required repeat anaesthetics for assessment and treatment of their condition. Method Approval for this study was granted by the East London and City Health Authority ethics committee. 40 patients are being recruited and being followed over a two year period. All children have retinoblastoma and are between the ages of 18 months to 4 years. The anaesthetic technique was not standardised but details of it were collected. Data collected were demographic details of child (age, sex, weight, ASA grade, siblings, stressful events in the last 3 months, recent immunisations, number of previous anaesthetics, problems with previous general anaesthetics, medical history of children, temperament of child using the EASI scoring system (4); demographic data of parents (age, parental education, family members affected, baseline measure of parental anxiety using State trait anxiety inventory (STAI). Anxiety on entry into the anaesthetic room and at induction was measured by the modified Yale preoperative anxiety scale (mYPAS), cooperation of the child at induction was measured by the Induction compliance checklist (ICC). Anxiety of the parent after induction was measured by the STAI score. Behaviour was measured at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 4 months after each procedure by means of the post hospital behaviour score (PHBQ) (5). A comparison with preoperative behaviour was made and data is presented of the percentage of children with new negative behavioural problems. A detailed analysis of the types of behaviour change was noted. anova for repeat measures with multiple dependent measures was used to analyse data on child anxiety and postoperative behavioural problems. Results Eight patients have had 3 separate anaesthetics over one and a half years. These have been at 4 monthly intervals. There was no significant increase in anxiety levels with repeat anaesthetics. The median mYPAS score at induction were 100 for all 3 anaesthetics. (P = 0.41). The type of behavioural change was variable and demonstrated no trend. No patient was identified as being prone to behavioural changes after every anaesthetic. Patients who displayed new negative behavioural problems would have them after any anaesthetic with no obvious cumulative effect with each repeat anaesthetic. Conclusions Our patients had maximum anxiety scores at induction, so the mYPAS scoring system is not sensitive enough to show that repeat anaesthetics provoke increasing anxiety. There is a very random pattern to behavioural disturbances after repeat anaesthetics with no evidence that negative behavioural changes are compounded with repeated anaesthetics. Collection of complete data from the remaining 32 patients may yield some trends regarding behavioural disturbances but our use of the mYPAS to measure anxiety in this very anxious population is unlikely to be helpful.