Abstract
Topic Significance & Study Purpose/Background/Rationale Prevention of healthcare-associated infections (HAI) is a priority of regulatory and national agencies and CMS implemented payment reductions for HAIs as of 2015. Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infections (CLABSI) in hospitalized patients are challenging HAIs that are known to increase lengths of stay, financial burdens, and overall mortality. HAI definitions are based on non-immunocompromised patient populations and immunocompromised patients often have increased reporting for these infections. Our NCCN hospital sought to better describe CLABSIs in our hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) population to assure appropriate reporting of HAIs and to identify opportunities for quality improvement. Methods, Intervention, & Analysis An interdisciplinary team including the Infection Prevention Medical Director, Infection Preventionists and Physicians, Pharmacist, inpatient Nurse Manager and a Clinical Nurse Specialist met monthly to perform intensive reviews of CLABSI events that occurred on an inpatient HCT unit. The review included patient risk factors for infection and the degree to which nurses followed the central line care bundle. As a result of these reviews, a Staff RN group was formed who were educated to became unit experts on CLABSI and central line care. Subsequently, CLABSI rates reduced by 30%. Findings & Interpretation CLABSI reviews found common organisms across cases, opportunities for improvement in nursing practice as well as trends in patient characteristics where gaps in care may exist. By expanding these reviews to other HAIs, situations where standard definitions may not directly apply were identified, particularly with Clostridium Difficile Infection (CDI). The interdisciplinary CDI review focused on common causes of diarrhea which were then categorized and shared with staff to aid in patient care decisions. Discussion & Implications Intensive review of HAI events and identification of trends in the immunocompromised patient population assures accurate reporting of these cases. Reviews also allow for development of internal classifications of causes and ongoing process improvement in patient care by identifying unique situations leading to those infections. While this process requires resources to perform data collection and to review cases, the subsequent potential improvement in patient care may offset those. Multidisciplinary case review can help to improve practice, decrease infections, and potentially decrease the cost of patient care.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.