Abstract
A counterbalanced measures design was used to examine whether the order of learning with a glass-box simulation about the life cycle of butterflies, and, a black-box simulation about the life of bees, differentially affected field-dependent and field-independent children's performance on two related knowledge tests. The children aged from 5 to 6.5 years old were classified into a field type based on their Children's Embedded Figures Test scores. Subsequently, they were assigned into Group A and Group B. Group A learned first with the glass-box simulation followed by the black-box simulation, while Group B used the tools in the reverse order. A statistically significant interaction effect was found between field type and order of learning with the simulations on the butterfly post-test performance, showing that learning first with the black-box simulation facilitated field-dependent children's subsequent learning with the glass-box simulation. The results tap on the issue about whether field dependence-independence is a cognitive ability or cognitive style, and the issue of the malleability of cognitive styles as well. Implications and future research directions are discussed.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.