Abstract

Based on the assumption that substitution of functions or function transfer is a fundamental principle underlying all conditioning processes, we attempt to produce an account wherein both operant and respondent events are understood in terms of substitution. We contend that, if event interactions are described in a way that accounts for all the stimulus and response events involved in a contingency relation, and further, if we assume symmetry as a property of substitution of functions as excitatory backward conditioning findings seem to suggest, traditional distinctions between operant and respondent conditioning may be rendered unnecessary. We present a reconceptualization of respondent and operant processes and suggest alternatives for empirical research.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.