Abstract

Network teaching has been widely developed under the influence of COVID-19 pandemic to guarantee the implementation of teaching plans and protect the learning rights of students. Selecting a particular website for network teaching can directly affects end users’ performance and promote network teaching quality. Normally, e-learning website selection can be considered as a complex multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem, and experts’ evaluations over the performance of e-learning websites are often imprecise and fuzzy due to the subjective nature of human thinking. In this article, we propose a new integrated MCDM approach on the basis of linguistic hesitant fuzzy sets (LHFSs) and the TODIM (an acronym in Portuguese of interactive and multi-criteria decision making) method to evaluate and select the best e-learning website for network teaching. This introduced method deals with the linguistic assessments of experts based on the LHFSs, determines the weights of evaluation criteria with the best–worst method (BWM), and acquires the ranking of e-learning websites utilizing an extended TODIM method. The applicability and superiority of the presented linguistic hesitant fuzzy TODIM (LHF-TODIM) approach are demonstrated through a realistic e-learning website selection example. Results show that the LHF-TODIM model being proposed is more practical and effective for solving the e-learning website selection problem under vague and uncertain linguistic environment.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.