Abstract

The quickly rising development of autonomous vehicle technology and increase of (semi-) autonomous vehicles on the road leads to an increased demand for more sophisticated human–machine-cooperation approaches to improve trust and acceptance of these new systems. In this work, we investigate the feeling of discomfort of human passengers while driving autonomously and the automatic detection of this discomfort with several model approaches, using the combination of different data sources. Based on a driving simulator study, we analyzed the discomfort reports of 50 participants for autonomous inner city driving. We found that perceived discomfort depends on the driving scenario (with discomfort generally peaking in complex situations) and on the passenger (resulting in interindividual differences in reported discomfort extend and duration). Further, we describe three different model approaches on how to predict the passenger discomfort using data from the vehicle’s sensors as well as physiological and behavioral data from the passenger. The model’s precision varies greatly across the approaches, the best approach having a precision of up to 80%. All of our presented model approaches use combinations of linear models and are thus fast, transparent, and safe. Lastly, we analyzed these models using the SHAP method, which enables explaining the models’ discomfort predictions. These explanations are used to infer the importance of our collected features and to create a scenario-based discomfort analysis. Our work demonstrates a novel approach on passenger state modelling with simple, safe, and transparent models and with explainable model predictions, which can be used to adapt the vehicles’ actions to the needs of the passenger.

Highlights

  • Autonomous vehicles (AVs) will have a big impact on our future mobility and society.Users of these vehicles will more often just be passengers instead of drivers, providing them with the freedom to devote their time to other activities, such as reading or relaxing.Despite these advantages, a major point of concern is the perceived loss of control over the vehicle while driving autonomously, which without trust in the vehicle technology, will result in increased levels of discomfort.many researchers are developing methods to prevent this feeling of losing control and to increase trust in the technology, through reducing discomfort and improving the individual acceptance of AVs [1]

  • To reduce discomfort in automated driving, they concluded that automated driving styles should be designed with a focus on defensive behavior and leave an optional degree of control to the user

  • We investigate how different approaches for model training affect the overall performance of predicting passenger discomfort

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) will have a big impact on our future mobility and society.Users of these vehicles will more often just be passengers instead of drivers, providing them with the freedom to devote their time to other activities, such as reading or relaxing.Despite these advantages, a major point of concern is the perceived loss of control over the vehicle while driving autonomously, which without trust in the vehicle technology, will result in increased levels of discomfort.many researchers are developing methods to prevent this feeling of losing control and to increase trust in the technology, through reducing discomfort and improving the individual acceptance of AVs [1]. Autonomous vehicles (AVs) will have a big impact on our future mobility and society Users of these vehicles will more often just be passengers instead of drivers, providing them with the freedom to devote their time to other activities, such as reading or relaxing. Despite these advantages, a major point of concern is the perceived loss of control over the vehicle while driving autonomously, which without trust in the vehicle technology, will result in increased levels of discomfort. To reduce discomfort in automated driving, they concluded that automated driving styles should be designed with a focus on defensive behavior (at least during the system introduction phase) and leave an optional degree of control to the user (e.g., by choosing between different driving styles)

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call