Abstract

Shell beads appear to have been one of the earliest examples of personal adornments. Marine shells identified far from the shore evidence long-distance transport and imply networks of exchange and negotiation. However, worked beads lose taxonomic clues to identification, and this may be compounded by taphonomic alteration. Consequently, the significance of this key early artefact may be underestimated. We report the use of bulk amino acid composition of the stable intra-crystalline proteins preserved in shell biominerals and the application of pattern recognition methods to a large dataset (777 samples) to demonstrate that taxonomic identification can be achieved at genus level. Amino acid analyses are fast (<2 hours per sample) and micro-destructive (sample size <2 mg). Their integration with non-destructive techniques provides a valuable and affordable tool, which can be used by archaeologists and museum curators to gain insight into early exploitation of natural resources by humans. Here we combine amino acid analyses, macro- and microstructural observations (by light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy) and Raman spectroscopy to try to identify the raw material used for beads discovered at the Early Bronze Age site of Great Cornard (UK). Our results show that at least two shell taxa were used and we hypothesise that these were sourced locally.

Highlights

  • Mollusc shells appear to have been among the first durable materials used for personal ornaments and building tools [1,2,3,4,5]

  • We found that use of relative concentrations gave the best classification results, but rather than evaluating each as a percentage of the total amino acid concentration, we normalised so that the sum of the six amino acid concentrations was the same value for each sample

  • Differences in amino acid compositions between molluscan genera have been shown by others and exploited as a taxonomic identification tool [38], [40,41], we should not necessarily expect the bulk quantitative values of the amino acid signature to preserve the same level of taxonomic information as protein sequences

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mollusc shells appear to have been among the first durable materials used for personal ornaments and building tools [1,2,3,4,5]. Differences in bulk amino acid composition between taxa of mollusc shells have been observed to result in different rates of protein degradation (racemisation) [36,37,38,39]. These composition differences have been used as a taxonomic identification tool for mollusc shells [40,41] and foraminifera [42]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call