Abstract

Habitat diversity is considered as an expression of biodiversity at landscape level in addition to genetic and species diversity. Thus, effective methods for measuring habitat pattern at landscape level are crucial for understanding the ecological processes. In this paper we propose to extend the commonly used model Patch Corridor Matrix Model (PCMM) for spatial pattern analysis. Originally, this model assumes discrete structures within the landscape without explicit consideration of “gradients” between patches. The gradients, often called “ecotones”, can be considered as “soft edges” which have a profound influence on adjacent ecosystems. Another part of information that has often been ignored are “small habitats” inside patches (e.g. hedgerows, tree rows, copse, and scattered trees), which leads to within-patch heterogeneity being underestimated. In this paper, the concept of landscape contrast is used to integrate the discrete and gradient landscape representations by incorporating small habitats and ecotones in methods to measure landscape heterogeneity. A height gradient is used to define the ecotones between forest and field. Then, patch contrast (i.e. Edge Contrast Index (ECON)) is calculated based on the height difference between adjacent vegetation patches. Artificial elements (e.g. traffic roads) are considered as barriers which are as signed with the highest edge contrast value. At the landscape level, a metric called Area-Weighted Edge Contrast (AWEC) is introduced to describe the landscape structure. The edge effects of ecotones, small habitats, and traffic roads are incorporated in the calculation of AWEC. Our test examples show that incorporation of ecotones and small habitats can smooth “edge effects” among patches and result in a more realistic quantification of habitat contrast. The contrast concept is especially useful in a vegetated landscape with less human impact. It could be understood as an additional interpretation to fragmentation of habitats with permeable edges among them. Consequently, this presented approach may enhance the understanding of the relationship between landscape pattern and process.

Highlights

  • Landscape metrics based on the mosaic model are often used in landscape analysis

  • Incorporation of gradient concept in landscape structure analysis helps to overcome the limitation of Patch Corridor Matrix Model (PCMM) that valuable information on patch boundary is missing

  • Not like the gradient model, the integrated approach is still based on a classified map which contains an additional category of gradient elements, such as ecotones on forest/field boundary

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Landscape metrics based on the mosaic model are often used in landscape analysis. In practice the application of this model may be over simplified by losing valuable information on the landscape structure, such as the terrain characteristics of landscape (Hoechstetter 2008, Walz et al 2007), transitional areas between patches (Kent et al 1997), and small habitats within patches (Hou and Walz 2013). Kent et al (1997) defined transitional area as a subset of landscape boundaries that represents the zones between plant communities with some degree of naturalness, as opposed to the sharper demarcations that usually occur between land-use types. Ecotone as a type of transitional area indicates the overlap or zone of relatively rapid change between two plant communities (Forman 1995, Kent et al 1997). It has a profound influence on adjacent ecosystems, for example, ecotones control the flux of materials and energy between ecosystems (Fortin et al 2000), functioning as ecological boundaries that contribute to the spatial heterogeneity of the landscape (Cadenasso et al 1997, Fagan et al 2003, Holland et al 1991, Senft 2009, Strayer et al 2003). The main functions of these small habitats in ecosystem are either providing habitats for some edge species or forming a network to strength the species movement, such as hedgerow network (Burel and Baudry 1995, Forman and Baudry 1984)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.