Abstract
This paper provides a novel risk priority approach for failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), which can overcome some inherent drawbacks of the traditional risk priority number (RPN) method in imprecise risk evaluation, risk factor weighting and questionable RPN computation. Considering FMEA team members’ vagueness and uncertainty in their evaluations on failure modes, two-dimensional uncertain linguistic variables are advised to describe the risk evaluation result of a failure mode and the reliability of the evaluation result. The grey relation analysis–technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (GRA–TOPSIS) is applied for determining the risk ranking of the identified failure modes. In particular, a maximizing deviation method is employed for calculating the optimal weights of risk factors in an objective way. Via a practical healthcare risk analysis case, the new FMEA is proved to be appropriate and effective in coping with the risk evaluation problems with uncertain linguistic information. Furthermore, by comparing with existing methods, it is shown that the proposed integrated approach excels in the risk evaluation and prioritization of failure modes in FMEA.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.